My understanding of what I want to saythe way in which I constitute it as an it, as something already achieved, complete, even if only for a while (and it will change once I’ve said it) is, of course, as a synchronic, relational system. It is not a fully coherent or closed system, even so, it is a mythologizing, but a convenient one; it serves as a contextualising, a synchronising strategy to fend off the anomic anxiety that is the pathology of our diachronic lives and conferences. |
|||||